Updated: August 22, 2026  ·  Reading time: 15–18 minutes  ·  Level: Beginner to intermediate

What if building a website started with a conversation instead of a template?

Traditional website builders normally begin by asking you to choose a template. You replace placeholder text, move elements around, install apps, configure pages, and repeatedly switch between design and settings screens.

ChatGPT Sites approaches the job differently. You describe the outcome you want in plain language, provide your content and brand materials, and let ChatGPT assemble a working website. You review the result in a private preview and request changes conversationally—for example, “make the hero more concise,” “add a consultation form,” or “improve the mobile navigation.” When the website is ready, you publish it and share a link without setting up a separate hosting pipeline.

That does not mean web planning, good copy, testing, security, or human judgment have disappeared. It means the starting point has shifted from manually arranging components to clearly describing the experience you want.

In this tutorial, you will learn:

• What ChatGPT Sites is and where it fits
• How to prepare your content before generating a site
• How to build a practical consulting landing page step by step
• How to improve the first result with focused follow-up prompts
• How to test, save, publish, and manage the site
• When ChatGPT Sites is a better choice than Wix—and when it is not

ChatGPT Sites is available from the More menu. Select Sites to open the dashboard or start directly from a Work conversation.

What is ChatGPT Sites?

ChatGPT Sites is a managed website and lightweight application builder inside ChatGPT. It can create, host, refine, and share experiences such as:

• Landing pages and campaign microsites
• Portfolios and event pages
• Interactive reports and calculators
• Project trackers and launch calendars
• Internal portals and simple dashboards
• Prototypes, lightweight web apps, and games

The important distinction is that Sites is more than a text-to-HTML generator. It combines AI-assisted creation with previewing, versioning, managed hosting, access controls, optional persistent storage, and publishing—all inside one workflow.

At the time of writing, Sites is in public beta. It is available on eligible paid ChatGPT plans, although rollout, region, plan limits, and workspace administration can affect access. On the web, start in Work. In the desktop app, Sites can be created through Work or Codex. You can include the word “website” in your request or mention @Sites explicitly.

Current availability and limitations can change during the beta. Check the official OpenAI Sites documentation and OpenAI Help Center guide before publishing an important production project.

The core workflow

Supply a brief, a design-system document, and visual assets; tell Sites to read those materials before building; review the generated result; refine it; then publish or share it with the intended audience. The workflow breaks into six stages:

1. Define the outcome. Identify the audience, purpose, conversion goal, and required behavior.
2. Prepare the source material. Collect approved copy, brand rules, images, links, and functional requirements.
3. Generate the first version. Give Sites one clear, comprehensive build prompt.
4. Review and refine. Test the content, layout, links, forms, responsiveness, and behavior.
5. Save a version. Preserve a reviewable candidate before changing the live site.
6. Publish and manage. Choose the audience, deploy, share the URL, and monitor usage.

The quality of the initial site depends heavily on the quality of the information supplied. A vague prompt may create an attractive but generic page. A structured brief gives ChatGPT a clear definition of success.

What you should prepare before you start

You do not need every item below for a simple experiment, but these materials substantially improve a business website.

1. A short website brief

Create a document called BRIEF.md or provide the information directly in your prompt. Include:

• Business name and one-sentence description
• Target audience
• Primary visitor problem
• Main offer
• Primary call to action
• Required sections or pages
• Proof points, testimonials, or case studies
• Contact details and important links
• Desired tone
• Features such as forms, filters, calculators, or saved records

2. Brand and design guidance

A simple design-system.md can contain:

• Logo usage
• Brand colours with hex values
• Heading and body-font preferences
• Button style
• Border radius and spacing preferences
• Image direction
• Examples of styles to use or avoid

You can also upload screenshots of websites or sections you like. Treat them as visual direction, not as material to copy.

3. Approved assets

Upload your logo, photographs, illustrations, icons, product images, and any downloadable files the site should use. Use descriptive filenames such as nala-networks-logo.svg instead of image-final-2.svg.

4. A definition of “done”

Specify the checks that must pass before you publish. For example:

• The page works on mobile and desktop.
• Every navigation link goes to a real section.
• The form validates required fields.
• There is one clear primary call to action.
• The copy does not invent clients, certifications, statistics, or results.
• The site meets basic accessibility expectations.

Supplying a structured brief—audience, goal, sections, design rules, and constraints—gives Sites far clearer direction than a one-line prompt.

Practical example: build an enterprise AI consultation landing page

For this tutorial, we will create a single-page lead-generation website for Nala Networks, a Toronto consultancy that implements enterprise AI and cloud solutions. The page will invite qualified prospects to request a consultation.

The website needs:

• A clear hero section
• Service areas for enterprise AI, RAG, workflow automation, and AWS/GCP cloud work
• A simple explanation of the engagement process
• Credibility without unsupported claims
• A consultation form
• Responsive design and accessible navigation

Step 1: Open Sites

On ChatGPT web:

1. Sign in to ChatGPT.
2. Select Work.
3. Open Sites from the sidebar, or start a new Work conversation.
4. Mention @Sites or explicitly ask ChatGPT to build a website.

If Sites is absent, confirm that it is available for your plan and region. In a managed workspace, ask the administrator whether Sites creation and publishing are enabled for your role.

Step 2: Give Sites a complete first prompt

Use a prompt that defines the audience, goal, content, design, behavior, and constraints in one go. The more specific you are here, the less rework you will need later. Adapt the following:

@Sites Build a production-ready, responsive, single-page website for Nala Networks,
a Toronto consultancy that implements enterprise AI and cloud solutions.

Audience:
- Operations and technology leaders at small and mid-sized organizations
- Teams evaluating private RAG, AI workflow automation, AWS, or Google Cloud

Primary goal:
- Encourage a qualified visitor to request a 30-minute consultation

Required sections:
1. A concise hero with one primary CTA: "Discuss Your Project"
2. A problem section explaining fragmented knowledge, repetitive work,
   and cloud complexity
3. Four solution areas: Enterprise AI, Private and Cloud RAG,
   AI Workflow Automation, and AWS/GCP Cloud Services
4. A three-step process: Discover, Design and Validate, Implement and Support
5. A "good fit / not a fit" section that sets realistic expectations
6. A consultation form asking for name, work email, company, project type,
   current challenge, and desired timeline
7. A concise footer with contact details and privacy link

Design direction:
- Professional, clean, light visual style
- Deep navy, blue, and restrained teal accents
- Strong typography, generous spacing, subtle gradients
- Avoid excessive cards, stock-photo clichés, fake dashboards,
  and exaggerated AI claims
- Keep the CTA visually consistent throughout the page

Functional requirements:
- Sticky but compact navigation
- Smooth anchor navigation
- Mobile menu
- Inline form validation with clear error and success states
- Accessible labels, visible keyboard focus, meaningful heading order,
  and sufficient contrast
- Respect reduced-motion preferences

Content constraints:
- Use the attached brief, design-system file, logo, and approved images
- Do not invent client names, testimonials, certifications, numbers,
  or guarantees
- Explain business outcomes in practical language

Before building, read all attached files. After building, check the full page
on desktop and mobile, test every link and form state, and summarize any
decisions or assumptions.

Why this prompt works:

• It names the intended visitor rather than saying only “make a company website.”
• It gives the page one conversion goal.
• It defines the information architecture without dictating every pixel.
• It states what the design should avoid.
• It adds functional, accessibility, and truthfulness constraints.
• It asks ChatGPT to test and disclose assumptions.

Step 3: Let Sites build the first version

Sites will interpret the request, create the project, and produce a preview. A detailed project may take longer than a simple landing page—let it complete the build rather than interrupting midway.

When the first version appears, do not immediately publish it. Treat the first result as a draft, even if it looks polished.

Sites reviews all attached files—the brief, design system, and logo—before it writes a single line of HTML.

After approving the logo assets, Sites moves on to generating social card images before rendering the final page.

The first generated desktop preview. Visually clean, but always review content, links, and form behavior before considering it done.

Step 4: Review the first version systematically

Review the site in passes instead of making scattered changes. A structured review catches problems that a casual glance misses.

Content review

• Can a new visitor understand the offer within five seconds?
• Is the primary audience obvious?
• Does the page explain outcomes rather than listing technologies?
• Is any claim fabricated, vague, or exaggerated?
• Does each section move the visitor toward the consultation?

Visual review

• Is the hierarchy clear?
• Are text blocks easy to scan?
• Is spacing consistent?
• Are colours and imagery faithful to the brand?
• Is the call to action easy to find without becoming repetitive?

Functional review

• Do navigation links work?
• Does the mobile menu open, close, and return focus correctly?
• Does the form reject invalid input clearly?
• Does the success state explain what happens next?
• Are external links correct?

Accessibility review

• Can the interface be used with a keyboard?
• Is focus visible?
• Do inputs have persistent labels?
• Do images have appropriate alternative text?
• Is the heading structure logical?
• Does the design remain usable when text is enlarged?

Always check the mobile view separately. Navigation, button sizing, and form usability can behave differently than the desktop layout suggests.

Review the consultation form independently: check that each field has a persistent label, that required fields are clearly marked, and that the submit button is easy to reach.

Step 5: Refine with small, testable prompts

Once the structure exists, focused prompts usually work better than asking Sites to “make it better.” Make one coherent group of changes at a time, review the result, and save a version before moving to the next change.

Improve the hero:

Shorten the hero headline to no more than nine words. Make the supporting copy
two short sentences focused on measurable operational value. Keep "Discuss Your
Project" as the only primary CTA. Do not add claims or statistics that are
not in the brief.

Reduce visual clutter:

The services section feels too card-heavy. Redesign it as an alternating editorial
layout with a small visual for each service, more white space, and clear scan paths.
Preserve all approved copy and keep the mobile layout compact.

Improve the consultation form:

Review the consultation form. Add clear persistent labels, useful field-level errors,
email validation, a disabled loading state, and a confirmation state that explains
the next step. Do not claim the form sends data unless a working submission
destination exists.

Run a final quality pass:

Perform a pre-publish QA pass. Check the page at mobile, tablet, and desktop widths;
test navigation, keyboard access, all links, every form validation state, and reduced
motion. Fix confirmed issues. Then list what you tested and any limitations
that remain.

You can also use the preview’s Edit control and attach a screenshot when a visual problem is difficult to describe. Marking the exact area often produces a more precise revision.

The Sites editor lets you refine conversationally while watching the live preview. Type a focused instruction in the chat and the change is applied inline.

Keep refinement prompts specific. Naming the exact constraint—nine words, one CTA—produces a more predictable result than a general instruction like “improve the hero.”

After the headline refinement. Shorter, punchier, and easier to read at a glance.

When you edit a deployed site, Sites fetches the current configuration, retrieves project details, and applies changes without creating a second URL.

The final refined hero. The headline now fits the nine-word constraint and leads directly into a single call to action.

Step 6: Add persistent data only when it is needed

A marketing page usually does not need its own database. An interactive application may. Sites can support durable structured records and file storage in compatible projects. OpenAI’s current guide describes D1 for relational data and R2 for uploaded files.

ChatGPT Sites currently provides one true database type and one file-storage service:

• D1 relational database — Structured records organized into tables. Typical uses: form submissions, customers, projects, status tracking, user progress.
• R2 object storage — Files and large binary objects. Typical uses: images, PDFs, documents, audio, and video.

R2 is storage, not a relational database. A Site can use both together—for example, store a PDF in R2 and its filename, owner, and upload date in D1. Do not collect personal information simply because the platform can store it. Define a legitimate purpose, collect only what is necessary, set access controls, and provide appropriate privacy information.

To add consultation form storage, be explicit about what must persist:

Store consultation submissions as durable records with submitted time, name, company,
email, project type, message, consent status, and review status. Provide an owner-only
view to list and filter submissions. Do not expose submissions in public client code.

Sites handles the D1 database binding, schema creation, and server-side insert logic automatically when you describe what you need to persist.

After adding persistent storage, the form also gains a consent checkbox so submissions are recorded with explicit user agreement.

After setting up the form, test a live submission then verify the D1 database directly:

Inspect the live D1 database for nala-networks-ai-cloud.

Do not modify or redeploy anything.

Report:
1. The exact D1 binding name
2. Whether consultation_submissions exists
3. The total row count
4. The submitted_at, name, company and email of the newest row
5. Whether that row came from my latest form submission

Do not use browser state, sample data or assumed results.
Query the deployed D1 database directly.

If it returns your latest submission accurately, the database works.

The form success state confirms a submission was received. Use the D1 inspection prompt above to verify the record was actually stored—a thank-you screen alone does not confirm database persistence.

Create a secure owner dashboard to manage your leads:

@Sites Edit nala-networks-ai-cloud.

Create a secure owner dashboard at /admin/submissions.

Requirements:
- Add Sign in with ChatGPT
- Read the authenticated email on the server
- Compare it against SITE_OWNER_EMAILS
- Never rely on a client-side email check
- Return 403 for unauthorized visitors
- Query consultation_submissions directly from the D1 binding DB
- Show submitted date, name, company, email, project type, message,
  consent status and review status
- Add search and review-status filters
- Allow the owner to change review_status
- Add pagination
- Do not expose submission records through publicly accessible client code
- Test with the configured owner email
- Save and deploy the updated version

After deployment, provide the exact owner dashboard URL.
Do not make that URL publicly visible in the site navigation.

The owner dashboard. Only the authenticated owner email can access this page—unauthorized visitors receive a 403 response.

Add email notifications by first inspecting the current implementation:

@Sites Inspect the deployed nala-networks-ai-cloud Site.

Do not modify or deploy anything.

Determine whether the consultation form sends an email notification after
successfully inserting a submission into D1.

Report:
1. Whether any server-side email-sending code exists
2. Which email provider it uses
3. Which environment variables it requires
4. The configured recipient source
5. Whether the last email attempt generated an error
6. Whether SITE_OWNER_EMAILS is used only for dashboard authorization

Do not confuse successful D1 storage with successful email delivery.

To receive notifications, the site needs an email delivery provider such as Resend, Postmark, or SendGrid. Add these environment variables under Site → Settings → Environment variables:

• CONSULTATION_NOTIFICATION_EMAIL = your-email@domain.com
• CONSULTATION_FROM_EMAIL = verified-address@yourdomain.com
• RESEND_API_KEY = your-provider-key (mark this one as Secret)

Environment variables are set in Site → Settings. Mark API keys as Secret so they are never exposed in the interface or client-side code.

After saving the variables, deploy the approved saved version and submit another test form to confirm delivery. If no email integration exists yet, use this prompt to wire it up:

@Sites Edit nala-networks-ai-cloud.

After a consultation submission is successfully validated and inserted into
the consultation_submissions D1 table, send an owner notification using Resend.

Requirements:
- Read the recipient from CONSULTATION_NOTIFICATION_EMAIL
- Read the Resend API key from the secret RESEND_API_KEY
- Read the verified sender from CONSULTATION_FROM_EMAIL
- Send email only after the D1 insert succeeds
- Include submitted date, name, company, email, project type and message
- Escape all user-supplied content safely
- Do not expose the API key in client-side code
- Log the provider response or error without logging secrets
- Do not fail or duplicate the D1 submission if email delivery fails
- Add basic protection against duplicate sends
- Save as a reviewable version, but do not deploy

Report the required environment variables and how to verify delivery.

Update SITE_OWNER_EMAILS whenever you need to change who receives the owner-only dashboard access and notifications.

Step 7: Save a version before publishing

Sites distinguishes between saving a version and deploying it:

• Save a version: Create a reviewable deployment candidate without changing the live site.
• Deploy a version: Publish that saved version to the production URL.

Every deployment URL is a production deployment. If you want to review a revision without changing the live site, save it first and deploy only after approval. Before deploying, confirm:

• There is no confidential or sensitive information in the site or its files.
• You have permission to publish all text, images, trademarks, and other content.
• The intended audience and access setting are correct.
• Forms, links, sign-in behavior, and interactive features have been tested.
• Privacy and data-handling disclosures match what the site actually does.

To save a version without deploying:

@Sites

Save the current version of my site nala-networks-ai-cloud as a new review candidate.

Version name:
Owner dashboard review - August 22, 2026

Important:
- Save the version, but do not deploy or publish it.
- Do not change the existing production site.
- Confirm the saved version identifier and build status.
- Show me how to inspect this saved version in preview.

To list all saved versions:

@Sites List all saved versions for nala-networks-ai-cloud, including their version
identifiers, creation dates, and deployment status.

To deploy a specific saved version:

@Sites

Deploy the saved version named:
"Owner dashboard review - August 22, 2026"

Deploy it to the existing site:
nala-networks-ai-cloud

Requirements:
- Do not create a new site or URL.
- Keep the existing environment variables and database bindings.
- Confirm the deployed version identifier.
- Confirm the production URL.
- Report whether the deployment completed successfully.

If you only have the version ID, use: @Sites Deploy saved version [VERSION_ID] to the existing site nala-networks-ai-cloud. Do not create a new site.

The Sites dashboard gives you quick access to Open, Edit, Analytics, and Settings for any saved site from one place.

Step 8: Choose access and publish

A new Site starts with restricted access. Available choices depend on the plan and workspace, but may include:

• Owner and workspace administrators only
• Selected workspace users or groups
• Anyone in the workspace
• Anyone on the internet, when public publishing is enabled

Open the Site, choose Share, select the intended audience, review the setting carefully, and then publish. After deployment succeeds, use Visit to inspect the live experience and Copy link to share it.

If supported for your account, a custom domain can be connected from Site settings. You must already own the domain and be able to update its DNS records; Sites does not register domains for you.

Review the sharing setting carefully before publishing. “Only you” keeps the site private; “Anyone with the link” makes it publicly accessible to anyone who has the URL.

The site in its published state with visibility still restricted to the owner. Switch to “Anyone with the link” when you are ready to share it publicly.

Step 9: Monitor and improve

Sites records basic traffic automatically. For eligible Sites, open More actions → Analytics to review unique visitors, page views, and performance over time. Analytics availability can vary by workspace type.

Use traffic data together with real business outcomes. Page views alone do not tell you whether the website is working. Track questions such as:

• Are appropriate prospects reaching the page?
• How many visitors start and complete the consultation form?
• Which questions do leads repeatedly ask?
• Does the page properly set expectations before a sales call?

The Sites analytics tab shows unique visitors, page views, and a traffic-over-time chart. The spike on launch day is typical—monitor week-over-week trends once the site has been live for a few days.

ChatGPT Sites vs Wix

Both tools can generate and host a website with AI, but they are optimized for different working styles. Wix is a mature website platform with a visual drag-and-drop editor, a large template library, SEO tools, an app marketplace, and established business systems. ChatGPT Sites is conversation-first and particularly strong when a website behaves more like a tailored interactive experience, internal tool, dashboard, or lightweight application.

Wix information is based on Wix’s current website builder overview, AI website builder, and plan information.

Choose ChatGPT Sites when:

• You want to move from a detailed idea to a working hosted experience quickly.
• The site needs tailored interactive behavior rather than only standard pages.
• You prefer describing changes conversationally.
• You are building a prototype, internal tool, dashboard, calculator, report, or campaign experience.
• You already work in ChatGPT and want creation, iteration, and hosting in one workflow.

Choose Wix when:

• You want precise manual control through a visual editor.
• You need mature ecommerce, bookings, blogging, restaurant, or marketing features.
• Nontechnical staff need to manage content through established dashboards.
• You depend on third-party apps and packaged business integrations.
• You want a conventional website platform with a long-established support ecosystem.

For a serious business website, consider a hybrid decision

ChatGPT Sites may be excellent for validating a campaign, building a lead magnet, creating a calculator, or launching an interactive proof of concept. Wix—or another mature CMS or commerce platform—may remain the better home for a content-heavy company site, online store, or operation that depends on established business modules.

The right question is not “Which builder is universally better?” It is “Which platform best matches this website’s operating needs after launch?”

Common mistakes and how to avoid them

Mistake 1: Using a one-line prompt

“Build me a modern AI website” gives the model little useful direction. Define the audience, objective, sections, behavior, visual rules, and constraints. The more specific the brief, the less rework you will need.

Mistake 2: Accepting the first output

A polished preview may still contain weak copy, inaccessible controls, broken links, invented claims, or incomplete form behavior. Always conduct a structured review before publishing.

Mistake 3: Changing everything at once

Large, ambiguous revision requests can accidentally damage parts that already work. Make focused changes, review them, and save stable versions between each round of edits.

Mistake 4: Assuming a form is connected

A form that looks functional may not deliver data anywhere. Test actual submission, error, loading, confirmation, and storage behavior—not just the visual appearance.

Mistake 5: Publishing private information

Prompts, files, generated content, stored data, and public access settings all deserve review. Remove confidential data and verify the audience setting before deployment.

Mistake 6: Treating AI output as final legal or compliance guidance

Privacy, consent, accessibility, regulated data, and commercial claims can create real legal obligations. Obtain qualified review when the risk warrants it.

Mistake 7: Choosing a builder only for launch speed

Consider who will maintain the site, how often content changes, what integrations it needs, how leads or transactions are managed, and what happens if the project grows. Launch speed is one factor among several.

A reusable master prompt

Copy and adapt this template for your own projects:

@Sites Build a [website / dashboard / internal tool / lightweight app] for [organization].

Audience:
[Who will use it, their context, and what they need]

Primary outcome:
[The one action or result that defines success]

Required content and structure:
[List the necessary pages or sections]

Required behavior:
[Forms, filters, calculators, authentication, saved records, uploads, etc.]

Content sources:
Use the attached [brief, design system, copy, data, images, links]. Treat them
as the source of truth. Do not invent facts, credentials, customers,
testimonials, or statistics.

Design direction:
[Brand colours, typography, layout, tone, visual references, and what to avoid]

Quality requirements:
- Responsive at mobile, tablet, and desktop widths
- Semantic headings and accessible labels
- Visible keyboard focus and sufficient colour contrast
- Clear loading, empty, error, and success states
- Respect reduced-motion preferences
- Test every navigation item, link, and interactive control

Data and privacy:
[What may be collected, what must persist, who can access it,
and what must never be stored]

Before building, inspect all supplied material. When finished, summarize what
you built, what you tested, assumptions you made, and any limitations
that remain.

Pre-publish checklist

Strategy and content

• The target visitor and primary goal are clear.
• The hero explains the offer quickly.
• Calls to action lead to a real next step.
• Claims, contact information, pricing, and policies are accurate.
• No placeholder or invented content remains.

Design and accessibility

• Mobile, tablet, and desktop layouts have been reviewed.
• Text contrast and font sizes are readable.
• Keyboard navigation and focus states work.
• Images have suitable alternative text.
• Motion is restrained and reduced-motion preferences are respected.

Functionality and data

• Navigation and external links work.
• Forms have been submitted successfully from the live visitor experience.
• Validation, loading, error, empty, and success states work.
• Collected data is necessary and access-controlled.
• Secrets are not exposed in the interface or client-side code.

Publishing

• A stable version has been saved.
• The audience setting is correct.
• Rights to all published assets have been confirmed.
• Privacy and legal notices match actual behavior.
• The live production URL has been tested after deployment.

Final thoughts

ChatGPT Sites makes website creation feel less like assembling a template and more like directing a capable web team. Its strongest advantage is not that it removes every technical concern. It is that planning, content, design direction, implementation, testing, iteration, hosting, and sharing can happen in one conversational workflow.

The best results still come from disciplined inputs and careful review. Give Sites a real brief, approved assets, explicit constraints, and a measurable outcome. Then treat the generated website as a first implementation—not unquestionable final work.

For a fast landing page, prototype, interactive report, or internal tool, that workflow can dramatically shorten the distance between an idea and a usable link. For a large business site, content operation, or ecommerce system, compare the long-term management requirements with a mature platform such as Wix before choosing.

Frequently asked questions

Can ChatGPT Sites publish a real website?

Yes. It can save and deploy a Site to a production URL and, where available, connect a custom domain you already own. Review access settings and content carefully before deployment.

Do I need to know how to code?

No coding is required for a basic prompt-driven build. Technical knowledge remains useful when reviewing integrations, authentication, storage, security, performance, or complex application behavior.

Can ChatGPT Sites build more than landing pages?

Yes. It can create lightweight apps, dashboards, trackers, reports, games, and internal tools within the capabilities of the supported runtime.

Can it store data and uploaded files?

Compatible Sites can use durable relational storage (D1) and object storage (R2). Request persistence explicitly and review privacy, authorization, and data-handling behavior before publishing.

Is ChatGPT Sites free?

Sites is currently available in public beta on eligible paid plans and is subject to plan-specific limits. Availability and limits can change; check the Sites interface and official documentation for current details.

Is ChatGPT Sites better than Wix?

It depends on the project. ChatGPT Sites is compelling for conversationally built, customized, interactive experiences and rapid prototypes. Wix is generally stronger when you need a mature visual editor, packaged business features, extensive integrations, and an established website-management ecosystem.

Sources and further reading

• OpenAI: Creating and managing ChatGPT Sites
• OpenAI: Sites documentation
• Wix: Website builder overview
• Wix: AI website builder
• Wix: Premium plan information

If you want help planning or building a ChatGPT Site for your own business—whether it is a landing page, consultation funnel, or internal tool—start a conversation with Nala Networks. That is exactly the kind of project we work on.